[ISM3 Users] Online Reputation

[Mahi Dontamsetti]

All.. The market is broken down into companies that just monitor and provide
info to you. It is upto you to take action. The second category of companies
can actually take action on your behalf. Several multinational banks I
interface with have contracts with such firms. These firms have
relationships with the police and federal authorities from several
countries. Some of them can very consistently bring down foreign phishing
sites within days.

-- Mahi

-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces at ism3.com [mailto:users-bounces at ism3.com] On Behalf Of
Bob Radvanovsky
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 11:46 AM
To: Vicente Aceituno
Cc: users at ism3.com
Subject: Re: [ISM3 Users] Online Reputation

OK, makes sense -- monitor only.  You might want to talk to some of the
folks over at the Anti-Phishing Work Group (APWG), as they've already got a
bit of a jump on issues such as phished or faked domains and web sites.
Something along those lines?  I have a few contacts over there, if you're
interested, Vicente.

-r

----- Original Message -----
From: Vicente Aceituno [mailto:vac at zenobia.es]
To: Bob Radvanovsky [mailto:rsradvan at unixworks.net]
Cc: users at ism3.com
Subject: Re: [ISM3 Users] Online Reputation


> Bob,
> 
> I am not saying "let's create a process that will prevent anyone from
> saying anything bad about you, ever, and find them out if they try", I
> am saying "What do you think of monitoring what others are saying
> about you, or are trying to impersonate your online presence, so you
> can take appropiate action about it?".
> 
> My best
> 
> Vicente
> 
> On 10/30/07, Bob Radvanovsky <rsradvan at unixworks.net> wrote:
> > Does this include performing exhaustive background checks on aliases? 
> What's not preventing someone from using a 'fake email' address like
> 'h0tm4ma at hotmail.com' and spreading all sorts of rumors about your
company? 
> Nothing.  Even if you performed an IP address check, and if they were
smart,
> their IP address would be irrelevant.  Think proxy server, cyber cafes and
> WiFi (esp. here in the U.S. where *unprotected* WiFi still runs rampant). 
> ;)
> >
> > -r
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Vicente Aceituno [mailto:vac at zenobia.es]
> > To: Bob Radvanovsky [mailto:rsradvan at unixworks.net]
> > Cc: users at ism3.com
> > Subject: Re: [ISM3 Users] Online Reputation
> >
> >
> > > No, it is related to keeping track of what others are saying about
> > > your organization and taking appropiate actions.
> > >
> > > Taking or claiming similar domain names would fall under this process
> > > scope too, as that can prevent phising or phising like attacks.
> > >
> > > To give you a real example; Someone is using the .cat domain to put
> > > companies under pressure to provide services and products in
> > > Calalonian language. Example: http://www.danone.cat/
> > >
> > > Vicente
> > >
> > > On 10/30/07, Bob Radvanovsky <rsradvan at unixworks.net> wrote:
> > > > Would this fall under the premise of hiring managers performing
Google
> > > searches on potential candiates *before* they'd consider hiring them? 
> To
> > > me, this almost sounds/reads unfairly...
> > > >
> > > > -r
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Vicente Aceituno [mailto:vac at zenobia.es]
> > > > To: ISM3 Users discussion list [mailto:users at ism3.com]
> > > > Subject: [ISM3 Users] Online Reputation
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Check
> > > > >
> > >
>
http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/03/online-reputation-monitoring-beginne
rs.html
> > > > >
> > > > > What would you think of adding an online reputation protection
> process
> > > to
> > > > > ISM3?
> > > > >
> > > > > Vicente
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Users mailing list
> > > > > Users at ism3.com
> > > > > http://lists.ism3.com/mailman/listinfo/users
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users at ism3.com
http://lists.ism3.com/mailman/listinfo/users